To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Maybe I just want slightly more than a WM, and way less than a DE. And to me xfce used to provide that, and I'm hoping 4.4 still does.
My definition of bloat is probably not the same for you; what I consider a useless feature may be a godsend for others. I don't need an integrated file manager and graphical archiving tool. I'd rather keep the apps as separate as possible (ie: move the bare minimum into the core xfce components). All I really want is their panel, taskbar, settings panel, and that's about it. Adding apps on top of that starts to move towards a heavier DE approach where everything is included.
I haven't even tried 4.4 yet, but I might when I get home, or maybe just wait until the final version.
The release candidates at least the first one unless there has been a regression feels better than earlier versions.
You talk about cross-purposes. XFCE *is* a lightweight Desktop environment. As far as features, are concerned you are talking about *feature bloat*, everything you need and nothing you don't.
KDE and I suspect GNOME. Can be stripped down quite heavily, because they are modular. search for kde-lite. I tried it for a time but I missed XFCE terminal application.
XFCE I would say is becoming a minimal collection of applications that fit in with XFCE i.e lightweight and fast alternatives to *common applications*.
Your feature bloat as you describe affecting it being lightweight and fast is false. The only problem I envisage is that a relatively small team, cannot evolve XFCE fast enough due to the amount of applications they need to maintain, and ends up like enlightenment.
"XFCE aspires to be a fully functional desktop. It has added separate applications, and new dependencies, but define the bloat."
XFCE is developing to a useful replacement for KDE or Gnome on systems that offer less ressources than "modern" PCs.
"Clearly they have tried to put together a suite of *lightweight* alternatives to necessary applications, and most are optional."
And if you want it "more lightweighter", you can simply use version 3 of XFCE. Runs still good on a 150 MHz workstation.
"Functionality is not bloat! Unneeded functionality is."
Furthermore, inefficient implemented functionality - even if needed - may be bloat.
I like the modular conception of XFCE because it's the best representation of "needed functionality". If you don't need a certain functionaliy, just remove the corresponding module. The rest of XFCE runs without any change.





Member since:
2006-03-12
I am always wary when someone calls bloat!
Start with saying what kind of bloat!
XFCE aspires to be a fully functional desktop. It has added separate applications, and new dependencies, but define the bloat.
Clearly they have tried to put together a suite of *lightweight* alternatives to necessary applications, and most are optional.
Functionality is not bloat! Unneeded functionality is.