Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Nov 2006 11:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 179965
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: SCO/Novell Ownership of Linux
by Kishe on Wed 8th Nov 2006 15:13
in reply to "SCO/Novell Ownership of Linux"
I thin Microsoft is creating second apple from Novel...soon you'll see microsoft buying whole lot of Novell shares and then give Novel all freebies that makes linux - windows interoperatibility(sp) top notch and ensure novel crushes any chances for other linux companies to grow while decoying their monopoly by having a "strong competant" that they net money from tough.
RE: SCO/Novell Ownership of Linux
by dylansmrjones on Wed 8th Nov 2006 15:48
in reply to "SCO/Novell Ownership of Linux"
Linux isn't Unix.
Go check Groklaw for more information on SCO Group (formerly known as Caldera Linux) vs. Novell - and of course checking out Novell vs. SCO Group at the same time.
There is nothing in the SCO cases to be worried about, since any Unix code in Linux would be free for use anyway.




Member since:
2006-05-14
Does anyone know what was decided between SCO and Novell? The proceeding seemed very scary, because the argument (Between SCO and Novell) basically came down to saying "Novell owns Linux (Unix?), not SCO. Novell did not transfer ownership of Linux (Unix?) over to SCO"
Is this were the argument was left? Anyone know of a site that explains what happened? Was there some resolution pointing out that Novell cant pull a SCO and charge fees for linux usage in some distant (or near) future....