Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Nov 2006 11:24 UTC
Novell and Ximian Microsoft will pay Novell USD 348 million up front, but Novell will return USD 200 million of that amount over five years. The specific numbers came in an a filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission made by Novell late Tuesday. "The financial commitments Microsoft is making as part of this agreement are significant," company CEO Ron Hovsepian said in a statement. In related news, Microsoft has denied that its patent deal with Novell is in breach of the GPL or will automatically spread Microsoft's patent protection to other Linux distributions.
Thread beginning with comment 180087
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: losing community faith
by milles21 on Wed 8th Nov 2006 18:18 UTC in reply to "RE[7]: losing community faith"
milles21
Member since:
2006-11-08

Again as long as Novell is not including the code in Linux and there is from the community no IP infringement code added in Linux then again How is the deal a problem. The MS code would have to run on top as is the case with Groupwise and eDirectory!

Microsoft does not have a leg to stand on as long as the community stays true to innovation and creativity. Opposing this deal often seems like a way for the community to potentially include the code and ask vendors to duke it out vs. being accountable for the code that is included. Again Because Novell does not own the Linux I see nothing wrong with collaborating to have applications run on top of Linux It could be exchange for all I care as long as the Linux remains Linux. I do believe this will be the case

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[9]: losing community faith
by twenex on Wed 8th Nov 2006 18:23 in reply to "RE[8]: losing community faith"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

Again as long as Novell is not including the code in Linux and there is from the community no IP infringement code added in Linux then again How is the deal a problem. The MS code would have to run on top as is the case with Groupwise and eDirectory!

Because then only Novell would be able to interoperate by providing Linux file services to Microsoft Windows? That's not interoperability in my book, unless you consider the fact that software from one division of Microsoft works well with another as "interoperability".

Reply Parent Score: 1

milles21 Member since:
2006-11-08

Not true this does not stop the work of samba, it is the same as Novell allowing Groupwise to run on Red hat and support it but not supporting it on Ubuntu. No one is stopping the development efforts of the community but a vendor meaning Microsoft should be able just as Novell what partnerships they want to openly and collaborate run their applications on. Novell will not be the only vendor that can interoperate but they are allowed to differentiate themselves and their deal does not affect the interoperability development efforts of the community.

I still think the deal is a mute point we are not talking about inclusion of code here, we are talking about applications on top which is what the end result will be. MS exchange 2009 for SUSE Linux, Backup exec 11 for SUSE Linux, just as Open Enterprise Server for SUSE Linux.

Reply Parent Score: 2