To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Windows XP SP2 isn't a new release - not even if had been sold as such (and newer retail versions actually are Windows XP w. SP2).
It's a minor revision, and not a major new release - no matter what people call it. You can then add on all kinds of applications - but that is irrelevant for the basic system.
The difference between FC5 and FC6 is bigger than the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows XP.
But why focusing so much on releases? The numbers mean virtually nothing - it's the functionality that matters and I prefer to get them incrementally.
As I said already --- looks like you don't know much about SP2 for XP and the changes it introduced. Maybe you want to go to Wikipedia and see it for yourself about SP2.
People like you, you know, "Vista is just eye candy", are just plain ignorant.
It's a minor revision, and not a major new release - no matter what people call it.
Because you say so.. LOL
Anyway, Vista went RTM 







Member since:
2005-11-10
That's a right out lie. I made it clear that it did qualify as a release, since the basic system is differen
Well, you're confirming that XP is a new release compared to 2000, then XP SP2 also must be new release compared to XP, because of all of the changes under the hoods. With MCE, there's even more.
Basic system is different when going from 2000 to XP, but, not different when going from XP -> XP SP2 or XP MCE ???
Don't think you know what you're talking about. FYI: it was Jim Alchin alone who made it possible that we get SP2 for XP as free upgrade, while Balmer wanted, new release launched. For a price, of course.