Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Nov 2006 17:07 UTC, submitted by deanlinkous
Thread beginning with comment 180487
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
How, exactly, will Linux fall?
by rcsteiner on Mon 13th Nov 2006 16:13
in reply to "RE: Damage Control"
Linux is a collection of software which is driven by, written by, and supported by the community, and most of the folks in that community don't really care for the most part what Microsoft does either except in terms of protocol/filesystem/document compatibility.
I don't use Linux myself because I hate Microsoft, but more because it does things I can't do with MS products on my existing hardware, and it does them at a lower cost than Windows would if it could.
Edited 2006-11-13 16:16







Member since:
2006-04-21
The most interesting part is that Microsoft doesn't appear to be doing any damage control at all.
I guess they just don't care. I'm sure they will survive if they don't have the FOSS community onside - they have already done that all these years, after all - but the fact that they don't, and aren't making any attempt to get it onside, is telling. My bet is this is their end-run around Linux. Linux stands or falls depending on what happens in the next five years at Microsoft.
And more worryingly, in the last week I haven't seen anything to suggest that the openSUSE people are doing damage control, either. They seem to be lying down and taking it.
Edited 2006-11-09 18:10