Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Nov 2006 17:07 UTC, submitted by deanlinkous
GNU, GPL, Open Source Novell has partnered with the Software Freedom Law Center to ensure that its partnership with Microsoft does not violate any terms of the General Public Licence. "The SFLC has been offered cooperation by Novell sufficient to permit a confidential audit to determine whether the licence provisions of the GPL have been complied with," SFLC chairman Eben Moglen told vnunet.com.
Thread beginning with comment 180639
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: cool
by walterbyrd on Thu 9th Nov 2006 21:08 UTC in reply to "RE: cool"
walterbyrd
Member since:
2005-12-31

>>
Novell do not believe Linux infringes MS patents . . .
Is it really that difficult to understand?
<<

Yes. Why is novell interested in an agreement not to be sued for patent violations, if novell doesn't believe there are patent violations?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: cool
by renox on Fri 10th Nov 2006 10:16 in reply to "RE[2]: cool"
renox Member since:
2005-07-06

Because what matters is not what Novell believes but what the customers believe.
Telling your customers that 'with us you're 100% safe, with our competitors we believe you're safe too but we don't know for sure' seems to be a good sell pitch.

FUD sell. But I wonder why so many people are so offended by it?
It's not like Novell was the only one to use FUD against its competitors..

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: cool
by twenex on Fri 10th Nov 2006 12:28 in reply to "RE[3]: cool"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

Probably because in this case, it's what Ballmer described as "high rhetoric". MS has always used "high rhetoric" ("linux is a cancer", etc.) but now he is bullshitting people into thinking they have stopped, which since they haven't is actually twice as bad.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1