OSNews

NotParker, every post you have made was either a misrepresentation, flat out wrong or simply a personal attack on others. You cultists are soooooo pathetic in your denial! You've repeatedly refused to answer the questions I have posed - why is the # of vulnerabilities more important than the amount of time exploits have been in the wild before it is patched?

Mozilla does have some security problems, but it's clear you are doing nothing but trolling here.

Edited 2006-11-11 02:17

why is the # of vulnerabilities more important than the amount of time exploits have been in the wild before it is patched?

What is most important to me is the type of vulnerability and the number of critical vulnerabilities that allow malware to "own the box".

I don't worry too much about a couple of days of vulnerability to a cross site scripting vulnerability that may allow some site to read what I'm doing on another site.

I do worry about vulnerabilities that allow your PC to be taken over. It appears you do not. Or you are the troll.

It isn't trolling to point our Firefox's vulnerabilities in a thread about Firefox's vulnerabilities.

Of course I understand that the cult thinks this is OSSnews and is only to be used to discuss perceived problems with Microsoft software and never to be used to discuss any shortcomings in OSS software. But this isn't OSSnews is it?