Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Nov 2006 19:47 UTC, submitted by ahmetaa
Thread beginning with comment 182634
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Although i agree it has advantages over flash, i think for this language to succeed Java2D needs more low level speed and resource usage improvements (like using simd instructions, direct access to opengl-directx pipeline) to keep up with Flash. Thats said, still i think this is a very good way of making appealing rich client applications (not browser) since it is integrated well with Java libraries.







Member since:
2005-07-12
Looks really really impressive.
To me, it's a much more attractive alternative to Flash, because of the following:
1. Flash is fully proprietary, Java is now GPL
2. Flash is a huge CPU hog.
3. Flash IDE/tools are very expensive, Netbeans (which I'm sure will have an F3 feature) is completely free
4. F3, running on a standard JRE, will have full access to the awesome Java APIs - Flash's APIs pale by comparisson.
BTW - with Java 6, Swing performance, LnF, and fonts are all greatly improved. Sun is starting to get serious about Java on the desktop.