Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 14th Aug 2005 13:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 18279
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
If they shipped early, they would have been slammed for shipping a buggy product - now they're getting slammed for holding a product back due to major bugs, you can't satisfy everyone.
Regarding the bigger issue, I think he larger issue at play is SUN's unwillingness to invest the necessary money to court ISV's to port their desktop applications to Solaris x86 - not weird, obscure, "no one has ever heard of it' stuff, I'm talking about big names like Adobe, MYOB, Quicken, Peachtree, etc. etc.
No one, I repeat, no one will change to Solaris x86 let alone Linux, until they can get the same applications that their business relies on for their work flow, and I'm sorry, StarOffice doesn't stand up against Microsoft - the only thing that *COULD*, given enough investment, would be Wordperfect Suite; it would require investment, but it is 95% of the way there, vs. OpenOffice.org/StarOffice which isn't even on the radar when you compare the features of the suites.