Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Nov 2006 13:23 UTC, submitted by anonymous
IBM Just about everyone has expressed an opinion on the Novell/Microsoft patent agreement - except, that is, for the 800-pound gorilla of Linux: IBM. Today, Scott Handy, IBM's VP of Worldwide Linux and Open Source, decided that enough was enough and it was time to state IBM's position. In an interview with Linux-Watch.com, Handy opened by saying that, "IBM has long supported interoperability between Windows and Linux. As supporters of open source and open standards," he continued, "we applaud any effort to bridge this gap."
Thread beginning with comment 184468
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Linux ... slowing down
by jack_perry on Wed 22nd Nov 2006 18:14 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Linux ... slowing down"
jack_perry
Member since:
2005-07-06

Zero growth is just around the corner.

Almost certainly not. It is negative exponential growth, which is quite normal, and probably approaching a positive lower bound.

The same thing happened with Windows, whose growth now is also much more modest than it used to be.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: Linux ... slowing down
by NotParker on Wed 22nd Nov 2006 18:20 in reply to "RE[3]: Linux ... slowing down"
NotParker Member since:
2006-06-01

Almost certainly not. It is negative exponential growth, which is quite normal, and probably approaching a positive lower bound.

Maybe. But an alternative view is that Linux has "cherry picked" all the easy Unix business it can get and really doesn't have room to grow.

Q2 2006 "Linux servers now represent 12.0% of all server revenue"

Q3 2006 "Servers run by the Linux operating system account for 11.8% of all server revenue."

A small drop. But still a drop.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

RE[4]: Linux ... slowing down
by theine on Wed 22nd Nov 2006 20:30 in reply to "RE[3]: Linux ... slowing down"
theine Member since:
2005-09-29

It is negative exponential growth, which is quite normal, and probably approaching a positive lower bound.

Out of curiosity: What is negative exponential growth?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1