Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Nov 2006 18:16 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 184726
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-06
Fundamentally the problem here isn't Novell, but the patent system. IMHO, one shouldn't be able to patent an idea that constitutes an obvious solution. Patents should only apply to ideas that require significant intellectual investment.
For example, I have no problems with most pharmaceutical patents because the products they protect require tremendous amounts of research and development, ie, Phd's spend years researching and testing ideas. Moreover, without patents the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't be tenable. The same however cannot be said about software. Software solutions can easily exist without patents and so too can the companies that create them.