To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't know. Nor do I want to pontificate on what I (or others) think is in the hearts of Linux developers (like Canonical), although I think the product speaks for itself. I do know that from what I have seen and experienced, that the developers of Linux, by an overwhelming majority, have the interest of the many at heart, that they work to produce fine accomplishments not for the sake of money (although it helps!) but for the greater good of the world at large. That might sound corny to jaded folks, those whose lives revolve around what's in it for them and/or the almighty dollar/Euro, etc...
My unprofessional view of a very complex situation is that MS is scared of Linux and, as the adage goes "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer" applies in this deal that is producing all the controversy.




Member since:
2006-06-01
To those of great character and high integrity, standing up for what is right takes precedence over monetary gain or advancement at the expense of others. It is a quality I have witnessed much in the Linux community and I think that is a major difference...to answer your question.
Canonical is a private company. Private companies don't get much scrutiny. How do you know what its doing is "of great character and high integrity"?