Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Nov 2006 23:05 UTC, submitted by SEJeff
Thread beginning with comment 185210
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Canonical is a private company
by NotParker on Sat 25th Nov 2006 07:58
in reply to "RE: Canonical is a private company"
RE[2]: Canonical is a private company
by twenex on Sat 25th Nov 2006 18:01
in reply to "RE: Canonical is a private company"



Member since:
2005-11-05
Trademark, Copyright, Patent... They are not the same thing or even close. In the US, they are all governed by very different laws. The Novell <---> Microsoft deal was a patent covenant which basicly says, "Hey, we won't sue your customers so long as you dont break this agreement."
A trademark is on a name. Would you like it if I signed up for other 'nix/computer websites and started posting as NotParker? That is what a trademark is for.