To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
//XPS is better than PDF.
http://www.amyuni.com/blog/?p=8 //
That page is weird. XPS and PDF achieve similar things, but ODF is a quite different format for a quite different purpose.
PDF beats XPS easily in several major, major areas that are not considered by the linked page:
(1) PDF is open to be implemented,
(2) PDF is cross-platform, and
(3) PDF is supported (in terms of both applications and in the amount of existing data in that format) far, far more widely than XPS.
Those three facts alone are killer facts for the XPS format.
// (1) PDF is open to be implemented,
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/xpsspec.mspx
So is XPS. Here's the full spec.
Try to be far more critic next time :
- A blog is everything except an authority on the matter
- what advantage is it to be "XML based extensible format" ? This is pretty stupid, as the only lack of PDF here is not being XML, which is irrelevant.
- XPS is not portable, and surely not multiplatform : this is a flat lie
- Ability to edit document is pretty stupid, but even then, the table is wrong on that matter for PDF
- Retaining print job information ... What does this have to do in a document exactly ? And XPS supports this nonsense !!
- Unicode only support for multinational character sets is considered poor support !
- It says PDF doesn't support remote document printing !!
- ...
Anyway, the author or the table doesn't say that XPS is better than PDF at all, that's just your wishful thinking.





Member since:
2005-06-29
XPS is better than PDF.
http://www.amyuni.com/blog/?p=8