Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Nov 2006 20:49 UTC, submitted by frik85
Thread beginning with comment 186730
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-01-17
http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php/Audit
states:
1. A function is deemed to have been implemented in a non-clean manner if
* "unknown" arguments given values
* functions for which there is NO DOCUMENTATION
* functions with no test cases available either in ReactOS or somewhere on the internet
* functions with undocumented magic numbers
* functions with excessive gotos
NO DOCUMENTATION means it cannot be found on MSDN, Google, sysinternals, osronline, any book published by Microsoft Press or any other publication.
This may be sufficient for a first pass, but is not likely to stand up in court. If developers are accused of using disassembled Windows code, an audit should compare ReactOS code with disassembled Windows code.
ReactOS should learn from Linux - the FUD from SCO had a positive outcome, which was the documentation of the provenance of the entire Linux kernel.