Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Dec 2006 19:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 188032
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-02
Many people who use (and pirate) Photoshop are *not* graphics professionnal who do print work. In fact, I'd say the majority of Photoshop users fall outside of that category.
It's like saying that Premiere is useless because professionnal editors use Final Cut Pro or Avid (or high-end stuff like Piranha).
The fact is that Gimp/Krita are very adequate PS replacements for a majority of users. Pixel is also a good (albeit non-free) alternative.