Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Dec 2006 22:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 188140
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-08-26
"ODF is still encumbered by Sun's patents. I really wouldn't trust Sun not to sue."
How can you, in turn, be trusted to acknowledge facts such as the following about the Massachusetts general counsel Hamel's confidence in Sun?
"In a message dated July 22, 2005, Sun's Jonathan Nimer notified the state that the company was "just about finished with preparing a statement about not asserting our patents, subject to reciprocity, concerning the OpenOffice.org XML" file format specification. State records show Nimer sent the statement on Aug. 1. Eight days later, Hamel informed various IT division colleagues via e-mail that Sun's covenant "fully" satisfied any legal concerns she had."
(from Computerworld article in http://technocrat.net/d/2006/12/4/11731)