To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The fact that it took you a month just demonstrates a lack of skill in Windows development, not a problem with Windows itself.
Even if you're right; you just flushed that "Windows is easier to install/maintain" argument down the toilet.
If a veteran Windows developer can't maintain a working Windows XP machine, who can?
(By veteran I mean: Been writing user/kernel mode software for Windows since NT 3.51)
Oh, and I've updated about 15 people to SP2 so far. Not one has had any issues (drivers, especially). I call bullshit on the SP2 complaint.
[General rant]
Call bullshit? Geez! What are you, a 3 year old?
At the times the OSNews talkbacks feel like a conversation with 8 y/o Aminem wannabies.
For God's sake, grow up!
[/General rant]
The SP2 issues were blown completely out of proportion by the media.
It was hardly as bad as everyone made it out to be.
YMMV.
/We/ had problems with SP2.
/You/ didn't.
/We/ are not /you/.
This is it?
All you had to counter my claims was: SP2 works just fine on my machine? (Oh, I forget, SP2 works on your machine and I'm an incompetent Windows XP user... I forgot.)
Along the same line of logic ... /you/ are not /everyone/. Just because /you/ had problems doesn't mean the /majority/ of people had problems.
And oh noes ... I made swear! Oh poo ... I'm such a bad Eminem-loving little boy. Right. Get real. I'm sure you're a saint when it comes to Linux f*cking up as usual.







Member since:
2005-07-06
The fact that it took you a month just demonstrates a lack of skill in Windows development, not a problem with Windows itself.
Oh, and I've updated about 15 people to SP2 so far. Not one has had any issues (drivers, especially). I call bullshit on the SP2 complaint. The SP2 issues were blown completely out of proportion by the media.
It was hardly as bad as everyone made it out to be.