Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Dec 2006 22:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 188266
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-03
So many posts talking about how this is good for OO users, blah, blah. This may be true from a user point of view that you can work in an MS Office environment better, but this "arrangement" is much big than just that.
What happens when MS changes/modifies the format and is slow to publish or give the changes to Novell? You have a temporarily crippled version. You might think that in a month or so we will get the update, but this does not fly in business situations.
So what does MS gain? Legally they can now say, we don't have a monopoly, see we use this format and Novel OO can use it. But in actually they still control the format and the market and can use that strength to control marketshare.
So what incentive does MS now have to really give a 100% effort in developing/maintaining the odt format? None.
In the long run this hurts all Linux apps using the odt format, not just OO.
Edited 2006-12-05 15:45