Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Dec 2006 22:26 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 188294
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The only ones who have to worry about OpenXML are OSS folks who would want to co-opt the format by stealing it and calling the derivative something else.
Erm, I think you are confusing us with Microsoft. OSS fundies don't "co-opt" or "steal" anything, let alone "call it something else"; the utter failure of the SCO suit so far has proved that, and the case hasn't even gone to trial yet.
MS, on the other hand, "co-opted and stole" Kerberos, LDAP and the TCP/IP suite, calling the second of the three "co-opted" products "Active Directory".
Edited 2006-12-05 20:48
Member since:
2006-01-06
That's FUD. The license specifically contains a Covenant Not to Sue. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenXML#Licensing for details.
The only ones who have to worry about OpenXML are OSS folks who would want to co-opt the format by stealing it and calling the derivative something else. The patent provision keeps that from happening.