Linked by Michael Reed on Thu 7th Dec 2006 12:07 UTC
In common with a lot of people who used to use RISCOS, I don't use it now and that is the focus of this article: Why don't I use it any more and what would it take to make me use it again? Of course, an article of this sort still has worth as there is bound to be some degree of correlation between my feelings, experiences and hopes in relation to the platform and those other people.
Thread beginning with comment 189201
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: ARX and other thoughts
by tomcat on Thu 7th Dec 2006 17:15
in reply to "RE[6]: ARX and other thoughts"
Member since:2006-01-06
RE[8]: ARX and other thoughts
by twenex on Thu 7th Dec 2006 17:49
in reply to "RE[7]: ARX and other thoughts"
Member since:2006-04-21
The open source OpenOffice and Firefox packages (which are also available for Windows) don't have kernels, let alone ones you have to compile.
And you don't have to compile the kernel on most distros anyway.
It's FUD like that which prevents Linux users taking Windows users seriously.
The sad part is that although my memory may be faulty on the point, I seem to remember that tomcat wasn't always so full of anti-FOSS/Linux crap.
RE[8]: ARX and other thoughts
by sbenitezb on Thu 7th Dec 2006 18:46
in reply to "RE[7]: ARX and other thoughts"
Member since:2005-07-22
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-04-21
Buddy, we're fast approaching the tenth anniversary of the Year of My Linux Desktop.
As for that other OS, or any other, it won't be the Year of My Other OS Desktop until I can get decent hardware support, stability, decent software support, and DRM-, bloat- and FUD-less operation, all in the same package. Open source would be nice, too.