OS X is more appealing to enterprises as a desktop operating system than ever before and although it is unlikely to take market share away from Windows, the Mac could reduce the number of Linux-based desktops, according to research group Gartner. In a report published by Gartner this week titled Enterprise Mac Clients Remain Limited, but Apple's Appeal is Growing, analysts Michael Silver, Neil MacDonald, Ray Wagner and Brian Prentice, said that administrators will most likely have to prepare for more Mac systems in their environment even though OS X is "not a suitable enterprise wide platform". Ars weighs in on the issue as well.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-07-06
Drag the app to the HD to install, move it to the trash to uninstall. Myself, I like the Mac install/uninstall system more than the Windows way of doing things.
I've often read praise for the ease of software installation in OS X. For the last week though, I've been setting up an old G4 (10.4 installed) and I've found it often requires jumping through a ridiculous amount of hoops. Especially with driver installation, I've run into two or three situations where the install process is: download a SIT file, it gets automatically decompressed after download (with no indication where the files are actually decompressed to - I had to run a search the first time), then you have a DMG file to double-click, it mounts, and there's an install wizard inside it (oh pardon me, install "assistant").
I can't for the life of me figure out why I couldn't have simply just downloaded the binary for the installer in the first place - or a SIT file simply containing the installer. I don't see what advantage the additional packaging of the disk image adds (especially when in many cases, the apps themselves are further "packaged" within a bundle). I've also seen situations, with people who don't fully understand the concept of disk images, where they don't realize they should move the app to their Applications folder and end up running apps directly from the DMG all the time.
Member since:2005-07-22
Member since:2005-10-12
Member since:2005-08-17
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:2005-10-02
Member since:2005-10-02
You do realize that you can install applications the same way in GNU/Linux? Not to mention that you can install applications in many other equally simple ways.
OS X isn't the only OS to have AppFolders, you know. Nor the first OS to have it 
The Windows way of installing applications isn't that bad. It's the lack of a framework for installing, uninstalling and updating installed applications that is the major issue.
Member since:2005-11-13
The Windows way of installing applications isn't that bad. It's the lack of a framework for installing, uninstalling and updating installed applications that is the major issue.
The windows installer is the standardized way to install, update and remove applications via .msi files.
The standard has been there for a few years and is in heavy use.
Member since:
2005-07-06
I would think so. At least, it's more appealing to me because of the games available like C&C Generals.
It's certainly easier to use. Drag the app to the HD to install, move it to the trash to uninstall. Myself, I like the Mac install/uninstall system more than the Windows way of doing things.
Mac's are a bit expensive, to me anyway. Overall, while I wouldn't mind having a Mac over a Linux computer, Linux is catching up. Slowly but surely. I've personally enjoyed watching Linux grow over the years.
I don't have a problem with either one. They both have their ups and downs. I'm just glad we have a choice of OS.