Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 9th Dec 2006 23:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 190355
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I have found that 70% of the people that try to install Windows 98 can't do it if they start with a new hard drive. Xp is better, if it is the only system on the drive.
Most of the people I know who try to install any OS for the first time don't have the skills to do so.
Most of the computer users that I am around (an office of about 50 users) don't know what a primary partition is much less an extended one.
I usually have to walk everyone through an install, be it Windows, Slackware, Freebsd, or Ubuntu.
And please don't refer to Slackware as "hackerish".
My install is a fine-tuned well-oiled masterpiece of Individuality. 




Member since:
2006-04-21
You couldn't say it is 100% useless out of your 3/3 install witnessed.
I didn't say it was "useless" either. What I said was, I wonder why it's so popular.
After all, say 10 people all try Ubuntu and Slackware. If 90% of them get 70% through the Slackware installation process, but 70% of them find Ubuntu can't find their disks, that's a higher success rate for the supposedly "hackerish" Slack than for the supposedly "user-friendly" Ubuntu.