To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I hope you're right. It's a shame, though, that it will be left to the community to do this.
You'd think that at this moment more than ever that Sun would support the 64-bit version of a browser from the very community it's just opened its source code to!
Edited 2006-12-11 21:16
That's why the GPL release of Java is a long-awaited thing. I suspect you will see more direct Java hooks in Firefox and other worthwhile browsers as a result, and no doubt there will be a release of a 64 bit plugin directly compiled on your operating system of choice if you are using *nix or Macintosh.
Of course, the tradeoff to this is there will be 3 different open source plugins, each of which has a different set of bugs/limitations.
I'd take 3 different plugins each with limitations over 0 different plugins that don't exist any day...
I'm not so sure I agree, though. It should be simple enough to do a straight 64-bit port of the official Sun plugin, and everyone would know that any others that are created might not be as well supported.






Member since:
2005-11-15
There still is no 64-bit firefox plugin on any platform. There is support for 64-bit IE.
That's why the GPL release of Java is a long-awaited thing. I suspect you will see more direct Java hooks in Firefox and other worthwhile browsers as a result, and no doubt there will be a release of a 64 bit plugin directly compiled on your operating system of choice if you are using *nix or Macintosh.
In a few months, complaints like yours will likely be no more.