Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Dec 2006 23:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 191070
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-08-21
Your argument doen't make sense. You suggest that the absence of changes to the UI indicate that...there will be changes to the UI. How is the absence of a thing evidence for its presence? And is the inverse true? If there WERE changes to the UI in the developer seeds, would that be evidence that the UI will be staying the same when 10.5 ships? You know, change things up in the previews to mess with the copycats in Redmond, and then leave everything the same in the final product.