Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 12th Dec 2006 19:03 UTC, submitted by Jeremy
Windows ExtremeTech takes a look at the six different versions of Vista and has devised a way in helping people choose which one is best for them. The article outlines several key features and differences between versions in a comparison chart.
Thread beginning with comment 191307
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Only dual cpu?
by arielb on Tue 12th Dec 2006 20:35 UTC in reply to "RE: Only dual cpu?"
arielb
Member since:
2006-11-15

Yes it's really so bad. Why buy 1 really expensive cpu when you can buy 2 cheaper ones. And who cares about what # I see in task manager. The end result is what matters and power users don't get the max cpu power available. Why? Other os's can do it.

Don't you see that this is just an artificial limitation to deprive choice in the market?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Only dual cpu?
by modmans2ndcoming on Tue 12th Dec 2006 20:56 in reply to "RE[2]: Only dual cpu?"
modmans2ndcoming Member since:
2005-11-09

No... a dual CPU board is already expensive... the next step up is 4 CPUs which makes the wiring insane and thus really really expensive. You pay more for the system with 4 CPUs because of the mobo than you would for a 1 CPU system with 4 cores.

besides that, if you are running 4 CPUs (physical dies with the extra controller logic needed) WTF are you doing running home premium?

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: Only dual cpu?
by arielb on Tue 12th Dec 2006 22:06 in reply to "RE[3]: Only dual cpu?"
arielb Member since:
2006-11-15

"No... a dual CPU board is already expensive... the next step up is 4 CPUs which makes the wiring insane and thus really really expensive. You pay more for the system with 4 CPUs because of the mobo than you would for a 1 CPU system with 4 cores. "

of course the 4 mobo is expensive. Only few people are capable of using it. If everyone was able to use it, then prices for those mobos would go down. This is the problem-you don't think what would happen to the market with more choices.

And of course, those looking for highest absolute performance aren't going to be happy either.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Only dual cpu?
by tomcat on Tue 12th Dec 2006 21:47 in reply to "RE[2]: Only dual cpu?"
tomcat Member since:
2006-01-06

Yes it's really so bad. Why buy 1 really expensive cpu when you can buy 2 cheaper ones.

Because they're not cheaper. Price them.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Only dual cpu?
by gilboa on Wed 13th Dec 2006 18:01 in reply to "RE[3]: Only dual cpu?"
gilboa Member since:
2005-07-06

Actually, you're dead wrong.

A Tyan Tiger K8WE retails at around 300$.
Two AMD Opteron 265's cost around 200$ each or 400$. (Even less if you choose the ebay route)
The total price of CPU + board: 700$.

An entry level Intel Kentsfield starts ~750$.
Most Kentsfield compatible boards circle the ~250$ mark.
The total price of CPU + board: 1000$.

Once Clovertown is released, the CPU price will be lower, but at least in the begining, it'll require an uber-expensive Xeon board.

- Gilboa

Reply Parent Score: 3