To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No... a dual CPU board is already expensive... the next step up is 4 CPUs which makes the wiring insane and thus really really expensive. You pay more for the system with 4 CPUs because of the mobo than you would for a 1 CPU system with 4 cores.
besides that, if you are running 4 CPUs (physical dies with the extra controller logic needed) WTF are you doing running home premium?
"No... a dual CPU board is already expensive... the next step up is 4 CPUs which makes the wiring insane and thus really really expensive. You pay more for the system with 4 CPUs because of the mobo than you would for a 1 CPU system with 4 cores. "
of course the 4 mobo is expensive. Only few people are capable of using it. If everyone was able to use it, then prices for those mobos would go down. This is the problem-you don't think what would happen to the market with more choices.
And of course, those looking for highest absolute performance aren't going to be happy either.
Actually, you're dead wrong.
A Tyan Tiger K8WE retails at around 300$.
Two AMD Opteron 265's cost around 200$ each or 400$. (Even less if you choose the ebay route)
The total price of CPU + board: 700$.
An entry level Intel Kentsfield starts ~750$.
Most Kentsfield compatible boards circle the ~250$ mark.
The total price of CPU + board: 1000$.
Once Clovertown is released, the CPU price will be lower, but at least in the begining, it'll require an uber-expensive Xeon board.
- Gilboa





Member since:
2006-11-15
Yes it's really so bad. Why buy 1 really expensive cpu when you can buy 2 cheaper ones. And who cares about what # I see in task manager. The end result is what matters and power users don't get the max cpu power available. Why? Other os's can do it.
Don't you see that this is just an artificial limitation to deprive choice in the market?