Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 13th Dec 2006 06:02 UTC
Debian and its clones DesktopLinux.com's executive editor recently decided to retire Red Hat 7 after seven years of loyal service as his home LAN's firewall/router OS. This article chronicles his trials and tribulations as he presses "pure Debian" into service, first as a server and then as a Linux desktop. Read the complete tale here.
Thread beginning with comment 191606
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Server Work.
by Finchwizard on Wed 13th Dec 2006 06:57 UTC
Finchwizard
Member since:
2006-02-01

Debian is my server choice for most locations.

Although I've started using FreeBSD and I can tell you it's awesome, even at a terminal, it just feels so much more solid.

I like Debian for those times you need it up and running quickly, because it's all binary, very easy with apt-get (Which I think is the best package manager out there, I've always disliked rpm's, even with yum etc) to set it up quickly and it's solid as.

I'm really looking forward to Debian4 with all the huge updates, going to be great stuff.

Edited 2006-12-13 06:58

RE: Server Work.
by netpython on Wed 13th Dec 2006 12:18 in reply to "Server Work."
netpython Member since:
2005-07-06

Debian is my server choice for most locations.

I use FreeBSD,gentoo,debian.My preferance goes to gentoo though.Their hardned project is the most sophisticated( documented) in my opinion.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Server Work.
by Yoke on Wed 13th Dec 2006 20:17 in reply to "Server Work."
Yoke Member since:
2005-08-28

Although I've started using FreeBSD and I can tell you it's awesome, even at a terminal, it just feels so much more solid.

Could you be more specific?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE: Server Work.
by Bobe on Wed 13th Dec 2006 23:08 in reply to "Server Work."
Bobe Member since:
2006-12-12

Could you elaborate on what "feels more solid" about a FreeBSD terminal?

I've always had exactly the opposite impression. All the BSDs always seem to be behind the times by default and take some tweaking to make them feel "right".

What I mean by that is:

The default shell doesn't seem to have all the abilities of BASH on Linux (e.g., going back to the beginning of the current command line when hitting the home button. BSD just beeps and puts crap on the end of the command line. In order to go back, you have to hit the CTRL + A sequence).

I don't like BSDs mouse setup too much.

Patching a system is easier on Debian (in my opinion).

apt seems more mature than cvsup, even if I choose to install from source, in that I don't have to edit files and jump through as many hoops to keep my system up to date or install new things. I'll admit that the new cvsup replacement, whatever it is called, is closer to what I like.

...to name a few.

Don't get me wrong, I really like BSD on the server, but I can't think of anything at the command line that would lead me to think it "feels more solid" than a Linux machine.

Please enlighten.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3