Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 14th Dec 2006 08:14 UTC, submitted by teigetje
Thread beginning with comment 192090
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links




Except that your OS does not run the vaunted RISC OS Photodesk!
Member since:
2006-02-15
Nice, what a quality article
Sizes of pictures and their quality as a proof of OS's superiority? Yeah, right
First of all, I noticed the pictures created under Mac OS X were much sharper. But as far as I recall, you can choose the amount of image smoothing when saving under Gimp as a jpg, too. And please, a text editor as a proof of an OS's superiority?? I'm not saying anything about the quality of either, but well, this article is standing on pretty shallow ground..

Well, I just tried in Gimp to resize that spider image, convert it to 8bit image and so..Resulting file size 24.6kb, and looks more or less the same as the one created under RiscOS.. What does that tell about my OS?