Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Dec 2006 18:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 192231
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: I had nasty problems
by sbenitezb on Thu 14th Dec 2006 19:40
in reply to "RE: I had nasty problems"
"And as for dependency hell argument, stop already. Seriously. Stop. Deb packages have dependencies the same as rpm packages do. I mean, ever try install a package with just dpkg or whatever it is? Without a frontend, such as apt or yum or what have you, that handles dependencies automatically, then yes, you're going to have to resolve them by hand."
Mmmmm... there was no pun intended. I remember when you had to install packages with rpm, and then you had to manually chase all missing libraries from internet. There's a long time since I don't use Red Hat, so excuse me if I ask.






Member since:
2005-07-08
In all my years of using rpm on various distros, including Red Hat, Suse, Mandriva, and Fedora I've never once had a problem with the rpm database being corrupted, aside from Red Hat 7 or so where they had the weird bug where you'd need to remove the .db003 files or whatever once in a while. This isn't to say that your rpm database couldn't get screwed up I suppose, but it probably wouldn't be anything a simple "rpm --rebuilddb" couldn't fix.
And as for dependency hell argument, stop already. Seriously. Stop. Deb packages have dependencies the same as rpm packages do. I mean, ever try install a package with just dpkg or whatever it is? Without a frontend, such as apt or yum or what have you, that handles dependencies automatically, then yes, you're going to have to resolve them by hand.