Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Dec 2006 18:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 192323
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The problem I see with Windows and software installations is how just installing something can scar your Windows system for life. Take AOL for instance. I mean, it's almost impossible to get rid of that junk after it's installed. Oh I'm sure someone could do it, but Windows is such a black box as far as I'm concerned that it's next to impossible. Linux on the other hand, you always know where you stand with something like rpm, or manually installing something into opt or what have you.






Member since:
2006-01-16
Sad but true, Linux and FLOSS could really learn from Apple and Microsoft when it comes to packaging software.
Are you kidding? Did you ever try Debian or Arch Linux? Or on the other hand, did you ever install software on Windows?
I found all the install shield crap under Windows was _really_ nasty and disturbing. Windows constantly has problems with overwritten DLLs and needs bullshit tricks like permanently copying system files over on boot etc. to remain stable.
With "FLOSS" - wether under Debian or Arch - I just type in the name of the app I want and do _one_ click / enter key press! I don't download stuff, I don't click Next, Next, Next, the uninstaller doesn't uninstall every file touched while installation, ...
I also like the Mac OS way, but only a little bit. At least, apps are easily (un)installed in a clean and unified way.
Having all the libs being maintained and updated seperately gives many features and I wouldn't want to abstain from this powerfull package management.. but it seems to be nearly impossible to do this with proprietary software.