Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 15th Dec 2006 21:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 193296
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Microsoft signs cross-licensing deals with a lot of companies. They aren't singling out FOSS except that the FOSS won't sign (except for Novell) and too many FOSS cultists act like they are being singled out and deny reality.
If Microsoft's lawyers are as good as...well, as good as they are, they know that the GPL isn't subject to this kind of agreement. Which is exactly why they have "skirted round it", as they have more or less admitted.
RedHat are the ones who are acting legally and honorably in this affair. If you're really interested in "honesty" and fair play, you should be applauding them and decrying both MS and Novell for acting...Microsoftily.







Member since:
2006-06-01
Cross-licensing agreements are incompatible with the spirit of the GPL.
Thats a counter argument. (I don't agree with it)
Lying about Linux not violating Microsofts IP is not.
Microsoft signs cross-licensing deals with a lot of companies. They aren't singling out FOSS except that the FOSS won't sign (except for Novell) and too many FOSS cultists act like they are being singled out and deny reality.
http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0geuppzP4RFk1YBs0ZXNyoA?p=cros...
Edited 2006-12-16 18:50