Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Dec 2006 21:20 UTC, submitted by mkools
Thread beginning with comment 194844
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Just to be clear, the real meaning in my post was the "use the right tool for the job" part. You are focusing on the bit of humor at the end.
I agree with the examples you cite. They come under the heading of using the right tool for the job at the time the job was done.





Member since:
2005-06-29
They've been meeting for 15 years though. Doom was a 2d program that used a simple, yet novel, illusion to appear 3d.
Then comes Quake, which is 3d, but keeps 2d interfaces for setting your game up (you know, the intro menu and all subsequent controls). Those 2d interfaces are rendered with 3d hardware though (I'm sure because it'd be very difficult to work windows forms controls into a directx context).
Then they met in OS X with 3d hardware performing 2d interfaces. And they met before with 2d hardware using image tricks to show 3d scenes for interfacing with your computer and gaming (that awful 3d desktop environment from like 1991, I think Microsoft called it Bob or something; and Myst).
They've been meeting for a long time, I'm not sure where you've been.