Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Dec 2006 21:20 UTC, submitted by mkools
SUN Microsystems Project Looking Glass has hit the magical 1.0 mark: "This release is the culmination of 3 years of work, starting with Hideya san who originally conceived of a bold, new type of window system, through the initial shake down of the proof-of-concept demo by an internal Sun community, followed by the open sourcing of the technology, which generated such enormous interest that it brought down the java.net servers several times. From that point on many people from around the globe have contributed to the project; contributing to the core, contributing applications, performing testing, writing and translating documentation, etc. The project owners (Hideya, Paul, Krishna and myself) are very grateful for all of the great contributions we have received from you, the LG community."
Thread beginning with comment 194844
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Kudos!
by ma_d on Thu 21st Dec 2006 05:59 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Kudos!"
ma_d
Member since:
2005-06-29

They've been meeting for 15 years though. Doom was a 2d program that used a simple, yet novel, illusion to appear 3d.

Then comes Quake, which is 3d, but keeps 2d interfaces for setting your game up (you know, the intro menu and all subsequent controls). Those 2d interfaces are rendered with 3d hardware though (I'm sure because it'd be very difficult to work windows forms controls into a directx context).

Then they met in OS X with 3d hardware performing 2d interfaces. And they met before with 2d hardware using image tricks to show 3d scenes for interfacing with your computer and gaming (that awful 3d desktop environment from like 1991, I think Microsoft called it Bob or something; and Myst).

They've been meeting for a long time, I'm not sure where you've been.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[6]: Kudos!
by sbergman27 on Thu 21st Dec 2006 06:07 in reply to "RE[5]: Kudos!"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

Just to be clear, the real meaning in my post was the "use the right tool for the job" part. You are focusing on the bit of humor at the end.

I agree with the examples you cite. They come under the heading of using the right tool for the job at the time the job was done.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2