To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
> you forget that before os X, macos was very bad
Oh, trust me, I know that
I tried to switch in the early iMac days, but OS 9 was a nightmare to me an so I switched back to Windows. With Mac OS X 10.3 though I felt the OS is much more robust, stable and of course I wanted this sweet Exposé thingy
So I bought a Mac and since then I never look back. It's totally irrelevant how crappy OS 9 was, what's your point here?
> new release of os X will have multiple desktop...
> linux have that since begining
I did use Linux as my primary OS (an Win for games) in 2003 for half a year and never got used to virtual desktop, it was not appealing to me, just confusing. Also, OS X had Exposé since 2003 and I tell you that the need for virtual desktops is not that strong when you have Exposé. I personally look forward to Leopard because Spaces is the only implementation of virtual desktops that has ever attracted me. It is not just a rip-off, Apple took the concept and made it, well, perfect, IMHO. But I wait with my final verdict until I've used it.





Member since:
2006-12-15
> You can't even compare how far in
> front Beryl/AIGLX is from eg: Aero.
How is it better? Aero is nor limited to only a number of compatible graphiccards, is stable and some apps that are incompatible make it go into fallback mode, wothout restarting the WM. Yeah, it hasn't the Exposé clone, granted, but I guess thats because Steve Ballmer fears to get beaten up by Steve Jobs.
> I can't compare MacOSX but afaik they don't
> even have 3d support properly yet?
WTF??? The Mac Desktop is an OpenGL scene for YEARS! It's the gold standard for 3D accelerated WMs.