To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"""or you would have seen that it is the politics of free software that has gotten it this far."""
No. It was a lot of hard work, good technical judgement, and an array of good licenses, the GPLv2 being one of those. A particularly important one, in fact, and I give RMS credit for that much.
But that contribution is from a very long time ago. In recent times, Richard has done more harm than good to his cause. Fortunately, these days, his influence has lessened.
Edited 2006-12-21 18:51
Your objectivity and lack of bias must be in the shop too or you would have seen that it is the politics of free software that has gotten it this far.
You're both right, but he is more practical in seeing that just politics, no matter how rightous, is not enough.
People need to be able to use their hardware and the content that the rest of the world uses.
Try to tell a teenager that he can't play his mp3 music or use doc, powerpoint files that he needs for school work, or chat with friends on MSN because it's all non-free and proprietory stuff, and you have an instant war at home.
Politics is a good foundation but has to be implemented with good tools.
So software like Openoffice.org and Firefox have been as important contributions to the FSF philosophy as the politics that preceeded.
And that's why distros like GNUSense will go absolutely nowhere and are a complete and utter waste of resources.
It realy is just a political statement and a very hollow one at that. At least without providing tools to supplement non-free ones.
If you want people to fight for your cause you have to feed them. Starving them will not bring them to your side.






Member since:
2005-07-09
Your objectivity and lack of bias must be in the shop too or you would have seen that it is the politics of free software that has gotten it this far.