To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"I did use Linux as my primary OS (an Win for games) in 2003 for half a year and never got used to virtual desktop, it was not appealing to me, just confusing. Also, OS X had Exposé since 2003 and I tell you that the need for virtual desktops is not that strong when you have Exposé. "
Can you explain what is so confusing about virtual desktops? They are just switchable desktops - what could be confusing about that? Your need for virtual desktops might not be that strong, but don't assume it is the same for everyone else. I like to uses multiple desktops for different types of work, e.g. communication, office, development, browsing, etc. Exposé does not really address that, so should i say that the need for Exposé is not that strong unless you like eye candy?
The bad thing about virtual desktops (at least IMO) is that I'm expected to use them *instead of* exposé. On the other hand, with exposé alone, my desktop gets cluttered with windows, like you said, from different types of work until it's hard to navigate even with exposé.
So why can't we have the best of both worlds? Virtual desktops for different kinds of work, and exposé to navigate within one virtual desktop.
never got used to virtual desktop, it was not appealing to me, just confusing.
I like virtual desktops, but you do realise you can turn them off, don't you?
Virtual desktops are not as nice as on-the-fly virtual screens, but they are better than nothing.
As far as I can see Expose is just Alt-Tab with a flourish.





Member since:
2006-12-15
> you forget that before os X, macos was very bad
Oh, trust me, I know that
I tried to switch in the early iMac days, but OS 9 was a nightmare to me an so I switched back to Windows. With Mac OS X 10.3 though I felt the OS is much more robust, stable and of course I wanted this sweet Exposé thingy
So I bought a Mac and since then I never look back. It's totally irrelevant how crappy OS 9 was, what's your point here?
> new release of os X will have multiple desktop...
> linux have that since begining
I did use Linux as my primary OS (an Win for games) in 2003 for half a year and never got used to virtual desktop, it was not appealing to me, just confusing. Also, OS X had Exposé since 2003 and I tell you that the need for virtual desktops is not that strong when you have Exposé. I personally look forward to Leopard because Spaces is the only implementation of virtual desktops that has ever attracted me. It is not just a rip-off, Apple took the concept and made it, well, perfect, IMHO. But I wait with my final verdict until I've used it.