Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 22nd Dec 2006 11:14 UTC, submitted by brewin
Thread beginning with comment 195553
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Good bye, Hans Reiser
by sbergman27 on Fri 22nd Dec 2006 22:15
in reply to "RE[5]: Good bye, Hans Reiser"
"""I am using ext3 on / with data=ordered as the option."""
And I thought you were just joking about Reiserfs trashing your machine. I'll bring the rope! ;-)
Agreed that Ext3 is rock solid. I would recommend that you actually benchmark it against other filesystems doing things that you normally do. Ext3 is quite fast. And where it is less so, the difference is not really that significant.
The exception being when there is a nasty interaction with firmware or drivers. I've heard from a couple of people who were experiencing horrid performance with a particular model of 3Ware card and ext3. XFS happened to work quite well in those scenarios.





Member since:
2005-07-06
yep.
I had it in a machine with 3 hard drives.
drive one
/dev/hda1 /boot 100mb ext2
/dev/hda5 / 20gb reiserfs
/dev/hda4 swap 1gb swap
/dev/hda3 /win 96gb vfat
drive two
/dev/hdb1 /home 160gb xfs
drive three
/dev/hdd1 /storage 80gb ext3
/dev/hdd3 /var 20gb reiserfs
there was a power failure, and when I restarted, the machine was throwing up errors on the / and /var filesystems. I used a live-cd to have a look around and could not access the / partition at all. /var was full of weird characters, but all the other filesystems held up and lost no data.
I usually use XFS if I want speed, but at the minute, using Ubuntu, I a, using ext3 on /
with data=ordered as the option.
not the fastest, but very secure.