Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 23rd Dec 2006 17:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 195868
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-11
I think Thom is saying that people complain about stuff like IE and MSN and WMP being bundled (labelling it unfair), and then he deems it hypocritical when Windows is criticized for not including things like xvid or yahoo support.
He has missed the point though. Those two seemingly different positions aren't necessarily hypocritical at all. For me, it's not a matter of disliking Windows for including or not including software X. It's a lack of choice in the matter that bothers me.
You can't get Windows without IE. You can't get Windows with ICQ. Both are a complaint about lack of choice.
It is not hypocritical at all to wish I could dump IE, and wish I didn't have to hunt around various websites to get xvid, ICQ etc support, and I'm not alone in seeing both as (non fatal) failings of the Windows model.