Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th Dec 2006 17:12 UTC, submitted by AmigaRobbo
Thread beginning with comment 195917
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Remember when computing was fun?
by ronaldst on Sun 24th Dec 2006 19:15
in reply to "RE: Remember when computing was fun?"
RE[3]: Remember when computing was fun?
by Kroc on Sun 24th Dec 2006 19:33
in reply to "RE[2]: Remember when computing was fun?"
RE[3]: Remember when computing was fun?
by Earl Colby pottinger on Sun 24th Dec 2006 20:06
in reply to "RE[2]: Remember when computing was fun?"
Which means when it is release it will be on the bleeding edge again. No thanks!
I got into BeOS only after they moved to Intel because I knew if I did not like it I could change to any number of alternative OS out there.
I am looking at new machines that can support BeOS/Haiku, that is limiting me enough as it is. There is no way I will have any interest in a machine with limited OS support.
Call me when 5.1 for Intel is released.






Member since:
2005-11-10
I was under the impression that AOS4 would only boot on dedicated PPC hardware (and not a normal PPC like a Mac) very much like RISC OS (except they sell a specialised commercial emulator too).
I can't quite understand this choice, as it only limits the users, increases hardware costs and lowers hardware availability. It's like deciding to make a great game, but rather than releasing it on all major consoles; deciding instead to release a special console solely for that game and that game only.
I used to use Amiga OS (and great that it was), but now as an outsider, my only opinion is that the next version should run on generic hardware (I've got a macmini that would dual boot Amiga), and forgo compatibility by emulating/virtualising an older environment for old software, in order to add proper multi tasking and memory protection, etc.