Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th Jan 2007 23:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 198940
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm surprised you even have to ask that question. Microsoft often likes to get into niche markets early, before other competitors become entrenched and immovable. Some call this "First Mover Advantage". The real benefit here is that Microsoft gets to improve its client through auto-discovery of media shares. There's a lot of benefit in that. People are adding lots of storage to their private networks in order to accomodate an increasing amount of media (video, audio, pictures, etc). Plus, assuming that it becomes more prominent, Microsoft gets to influence the direction of streaming protocols, etc, which are vital for caching, playback, etc.







Member since:
2006-01-06
I don't really see a lot of value in a specific home server product. It would be just as easy to create a network share on a desktop PC offering, for example, your MP3 collection. But, of course, understanding and setting up a network share isn't all that easy for the average user. So, perhaps what MS is going after is a simple network-connected hard drive that will automatically broadcast its presence, that will be discovered by clients that know what to look for, and which will offer more than basic file/print services; for example, streaming. Perhaps it's simply a small-scale webserver that supports WebDAV. That would solve a lot of problems.