Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Jan 2007 23:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 199701
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-23
I think that in an ideal world having home servers would be good, as all your data would be stored locally, within the owner's control.
It would further push the idea of a peer-to-peer Internet instead of a one with a dominant privileged-server/unprivileged-client architecture, which is sadly getting somewhat popular nowadays.
It would lead to everyone having their own external IP address, and not being at the mercy of their ISP (think incoming port blocking).
Personally I don't like the idea of capitalist corporations having unrestricted access to my mail, photos or other personal information on their centralised servers.
My opinion is that home servers would be good for the internet users at large, even if it's Microsoft that backs them.
That said, it is hard to judge if all of this would be feasible to implement.