To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Or, it's all planned by Apple and Cisco. Big hooplah, they settle, both companies get a lot of free advertising.
Mmm, black helicopters...
Given that this news has negatively affected Apple's share price (which anyone could have predicted), I think such action would probably be illegal. Not that Steve Jobs seems to care much about the legalities of share dealing, of course.
Also, it's not like Apple need any more publicity for this thing: it was on the front of national newspapers here today, for goodness' sake. And this doesn't exactly make them look good.
Having thought about it, I think it's most likely that they expected to be sued, and will try to use the court case to extract some reasonable licensing terms out of Cisco. I don't know enough about US trademark law though to know whether a judge can force such a thing however.




Member since:
2005-06-29
Or, it's all planned by Apple and Cisco. Big hooplah, they settle, both companies get a lot of free advertising.
Mmm, black helicopters...