Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 13th Jan 2007 00:12 UTC, submitted by Charles A Landemaine
Thread beginning with comment 201365
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: One thing is for sure...
by celt on Sat 13th Jan 2007 14:52
in reply to "RE[5]: One thing is for sure..."
RE[7]: One thing is for sure...
by Joe User on Sat 13th Jan 2007 14:55
in reply to "RE[6]: One thing is for sure..."
One thing is for "no so"sure...
by startxjeff on Mon 15th Jan 2007 16:09
in reply to "RE[5]: One thing is for sure..."




Member since:
2005-06-29
C'mon, then all software vendors decided to write buggy applications just because their developers left bugs here and there. Nonesense. Why would Microsoft spend millions of dollars spreading the idea that Windows is more secure than Linux if they decided to make it unsecure then?