Username or EmailPassword
C'mon, then all software vendors decided to write buggy applications just because their developers left bugs here and there. Nonesense. Why would Microsoft spend millions of dollars spreading the idea that Windows is more secure than Linux if they decided to make it unsecure then?
I'm not saying it's intentional, there is so much bloat that they can't maintain the code to any degree of quality.
This IS their responsibility, period.
Ah yes of course. They're responsible but it's not intentional. They wrote their own code.
Microsoft's Vista marketing campaign reads "the most secure version of Windows ever produced" - it does not compare security.
You must have been one of those people who actually bought a Betamax.