To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So let me get this straight. It doesn't have the same core as OSX, or the same interface, and doesn't run OSX apps? Well next time someone tries to tell me my OpenBSD box is behind OSX, I'll just say it IS OSX. The core is different, the interface is different, and it doesn't run OSX apps but apparently that doesn't apply to the imposter running on the iPhone either.
So let me get this straight. It doesn't have the same core as OSX, or the same interface, and doesn't run OSX apps? Well next time someone tries to tell me my OpenBSD box is behind OSX, I'll just say it IS OSX. The core is different, the interface is different, and it doesn't run OSX apps but apparently that doesn't apply to the imposter running on the iPhone either.
Yep, you're right, just like the imposter sitting on my desk at school that purports to run Windows XP. I'm unable to install applications on this desktop, so it is clearly an imposter. Oh, and FIY, Linksys wireless routers didn't run Linux either by your logic, since you can't install KDE on it.
And again I ask, who says it doesn't have the same core? There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that proves that Darwin isn't running on the iPhone. None. Nada. Zip.
As for a different interface.....friggin duh! Look at the screen size man. You're delusional if you think a 3.5" screen on a cell phone would run the same interface I'm using on my 20" widescreen. Linux on the Linksys router doesn't run the same interface as most desktop Linux installs either.
As for the apps, this has nothing to do with what OS it is running. Steve Jobs could release an iMac running OS X with no ability to install apps if he pleased. This is a licensing and contract issue and has absolutely nothing to do with the operating system. The same restriction could be applied to a Palm or Windows Mobile handset.







Member since:
2005-06-28
Slashdot's "source" was just a random guy who did a news submission. And yet, they posted his submission.
> What makes you so sure that your sources are any more reliable than Slashdots are?
Do you think I would fall for that? ;-)
Edited 2007-01-14 00:15