Linked by Thomas Leonard on Tue 16th Jan 2007 00:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 202065
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: The new wheel is still round.
by Tom5 on Tue 16th Jan 2007 08:25
in reply to "The new wheel is still round."
1) the files are "distro neutral" which just screams "staticly linked"
Not necessarily. The article has a whole section on handling shared libraries:
http://osnews.com/story.php/16956/Decentralised-Installation-System...
since they are self contained, there is no centralize means to update them if bugs are found, or upstream dependencies change.
That doesn't follow at all. Zero Install, for example, lets you specify any number of 'feeds' for a single program. One might be 'upstream', another might be your distribution's security team.




Member since:
2006-01-16
These installers do the same thing as the centralized systems, but with all the voodoo contained within the file itself instead of comming from a centralized system.
There are two distince disadvantages to this approach:
1) the files are "distro neutral" which just screams "staticly linked"
2) since they are self contained, there is no centralize means to update them if bugs are found, or upstream dependencies change.
Re-inventing the whell is great, but the wheel has to be significantly better in order to convince people to use it. A distro specific solution offers all kinds of advantages that "distro neutral" solutions just can't compete with.