Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Jan 2007 13:49 UTC, submitted by jayson.knight
Thread beginning with comment 202435
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2006-02-11
I don't even understand why you are making such comparisons. It doesn't matter what argument you come up with for microsoft in favour of OSX pricing , microsofts operating system is still over priced. And I think many of us are missing the point. The piece of software is "JUST" an operating system. You can't do anything useful with it until you run programs on top of it. Vista may promise to do a lot of things but it's work a plug nickel apart from the programs that run on top of it.
So the arguments of gimp vs photoshop , quark vs scribus etc ,really are not worth having. ... they stray from the point. Is it worth forking out so much cash for an operating system , which is almost the same price as a new machine , when all it REALLY REALLY does is execute programs ..... please nobody even mention the "applications" that come with vista as a counter argument.