Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Jan 2007 14:08 UTC, submitted by RJ
Thread beginning with comment 202441
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-02-15
There's simply no evidence for that whatsoever, and again, it doesn't explain why more code has gone into Linux than any BSD for all kinds of hardware and purposes.
Quantity is not quality. "More code" is not the same as "better system."
It still doesn't explain why more code has flowed into Linux.
It has nothing to do with the respective licenses and everything to do with the nature of the developer communities.
Linux Torvalds is a likeable guy who deliberately put together a system of participation that encouraged less experienced developers to become part of the process and thereby grow into better developers. LKML, Linux janitors, and a bunch of other initiatives have made developing for Linux attractive.
The BSD developers are less egalitarian and more interested in having a tighter focus on what they do.
Neither approach is better or worse than the other, but they lead to very different dynamics and that has nothing to do with the licensing approach.
Had the BSDI suit been settled earlier, Linus would, he says, have forked a BSD distro and gone from there. He'd have lived with the BSD license and BSD development, at least in his variant, would be just as Linux development is now.