Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 17th Jan 2007 10:20 UTC, submitted by Michael Larabel
Thread beginning with comment 202789
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
> Fedora is now pointing people to the non-Free stuff
> and making it as easy to install the non-free stuff
> as any other distribution.
Not quite. While they do sometimes point you to legal ways of obtaining proprietary software, they go out of their way to avoid mentioning non-free (patent-encumbered in the US) repos such as livna.
> Fedora recently rejected making a free-software
> update of Xorg because it would inconvenience
> non-free software users.
That's stretching it a bit. The Fedora project didn't release 7.1 to the FC5 repositories (FC5 came with 7.0), but as far as I know, Fedora don't usually do upgrades to major software such as Xorg during releases. But yes: the fact that there were no nVidia or ATI drivers for 7.1 at the time did play a part, mainly since very few users would actually have any use for 7.1 without those drivers.