Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Jan 2007 10:26 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 204322
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: This is not the year of the Linux desktop... again
by archiesteel on Mon 22nd Jan 2007 15:10
in reply to "RE[2]: This is not the year of the Linux desktop... again"
The very thing that makes Linux unique (ie. NOT Windows) is all the different versions and the fact anyone can change anything and call it a new distro. As long as that mentality stays, it will never be a Windows replacement.
I disagree, I don't think this has actually hampered Linux adoption in the least. That doesn't mean there shouldn't be increased standardization, as the LSB and freedesktop.org have done (and will continue to do).
Don't even get me started on package managers...
Package managers are great, and they can work alongside standalone installers/statically-linked installs.
If Package Managers sucked, then why would Microsoft have adopted a form of them for Windows?






Member since:
2006-01-17
Exactly. The very thing that makes Linux unique (ie. NOT Windows) is all the different versions and the fact anyone can change anything and call it a new distro. As long as that mentality stays, it will never be a Windows replacement. Don't even get me started on package managers...