Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Jan 2007 23:10 UTC, submitted by Governa
Thread beginning with comment 204748
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: I think the bigger question...
by kaiwai on Tue 23rd Jan 2007 04:48
in reply to "RE[3]: I think the bigger question..."
RE[5]: I think the bigger question...
by SReilly on Tue 23rd Jan 2007 15:00
in reply to "RE[4]: I think the bigger question..."
I wouldn't call it ignorance. What the big security vendors where bitchen' about has more to do with MS not releasing the specs to the API. MS is known for either charging for the information or flat out suppressing it.
How can you expect a company to tailor it's products to a system if you don't have the information pertaining to that system?
I do agree that their PR sounded like a bunch of winging children having a hissy fit.






Member since:
2005-11-10
Right an API that does not let the security product have access to some of the areas of the OS that the bad guys can get to. Typical!
This is typical, as fast as MS makes products, hackers, crackers and the like, kill Windows before it even gets off the starting block!