To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
you can be held accountable, that's why businesses practice due diligence before adopting technologies. If they can't prove that they researched beyond the sales rhetoric the other company fed them, they will be held responsible.
Agreed. But political bickering on message boards or blog sites doesn't exactly factor into a businesses due diligence. It's more along the lines of, does Software Package A do what we need it to do? How does it compare to Software Package B? Not what does linuxrules_microsoftsux431@gpl4life.org think about Software Package A?
Yes, that's a bit over the top, but you get my point.
"""
It's more along the lines of, does Software Package A do what we need it to do? How does it compare to Software Package B? Not what does linuxrules_microsoftsux431@gpl4life.org think about Software Package A?
Yes, that's a bit over the top, but you get my point.
"""
I disagree. That is not at all over the top. It's what we see here on OSNews every day. ;-)
Edited 2007-01-24 15:52






Member since:
2006-05-22
you can be held accountable, that's why businesses practice due diligence before adopting technologies. If they can't prove that they researched beyond the sales rhetoric the other company fed them, they will be held responsible.